Managing orthopaedic patients with multiple joint pathologies—commonly known as multimorbid orthopaedic patients—can be intricate. These patients often have several co-existing joint issues such as hip osteoarthritis, knee degeneration, and shoulder impingements. Each condition demands attention, but without a clear strategy, care can become disjointed. This post offers a practical guide on coordinating referrals, determining surgical sequencing, and ensuring patient-centred outcomes.
1. Understanding the Patient’s Whole Health Profile
Before any decision-making, having a comprehensive picture of the patient's health is crucial. That means:
- Complete clinical history: Identify existing joint problems, chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular disease), and functional limitations.
- Current investigations: Imaging (X-rays, MRI), lab results (e.g., HbA1c, inflammatory markers), and functional assessments (e.g., gait, range of motion).
- Patient priorities: What bothers them most—pain, mobility limitations, functional independence?
This broad view helps set the stage for collaborative care.
2. Coordinating Referrals Effectively
Multidisciplinary communication is the backbone of well-orchestrated care. Here’s an effective approach:
- Primary care physician (GP): Often the first contact and coordinator. Communicate clearly and encourage periodic review.
- Specialist physicians: Rheumatologists or general physicians for medical optimisation, especially for comorbid conditions like diabetes or cardiovascular disease.
- Allied health: Physiotherapists, dietitians, occupational therapists support preparation and recovery.
- Anaesthetist and pre-admission clinic: Evaluate surgical risk, medication review, and prehabilitation.
Tip: Use shared-care plans and electronic records to ensure everyone knows who’s doing what.
3. Sequencing Surgical Priorities
When multiple joints need surgery, deciding which to address first requires careful thought. Here’s a stepwise way:
- Evaluate pain and function: First address the joint causing most limitation.
- Assess complexity and risk: Prioritise less risky, quicker recovery procedures if they meaningfully improve quality of life.
- Impact on rehabilitation: If your patient has severe knee arthritis that will hamper rehab after hip surgery, consider fixing the knee first—or vice versa.
- Patient goals: Some may value pain relief, while others prioritise mobility or independence.
- Comorbidity control: Delay elective surgery until conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension) are stable.
In practice: For a patient with both hip and knee arthritis, I usually begin with whichever joint impairs walking the most and offers the greatest functional gain.
4. Case Example: Mrs. T
Background: 72-year-old with bilateral hip osteoarthritis, right knee osteoarthritis, type 2 diabetes, and mild heart disease.
Assessment:
- Hip pain is most severe affecting walking
- Diabetes under reasonable control (HbA1c ~7.2%)
- Cardiac assessment deemed low risk with optimisation.
Referral sequence:
- Rheumatologist: Reviewed diabetic and cardiac medication adjustment.
- Anaesthetist: Approved a hip-first approach.
- Physiotherapist: Started prehabilitation focusing on hip muscle strength.
Surgery plan:
- Right hip replacement.
- Strength training and rehab.
- Reassess and proceed with right knee replacement.
- Consider future left hip procedure as needed.
Outcomes: Patient improved gait after hip surgery, easing rehab for subsequent knee surgery.
5. Practical Steps for Clinicians
- Multidisciplinary meeting: Essential for planning complex cases.
- Patient-centred discussion: Involve patients in sequencing decisions.
- Provisional scheduling: Block multiple procedure dates ahead of time; flexibility is key.
- Reassess pre-surgery: Update medical status before each surgery.
- Coordinate rehab: Ensure therapy pathways are continuous between procedures.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can two joint replacements be done in the same hospital admission?
A: Yes, in select cases like bilateral knee replacements. But the increased length of anaesthesia and risk may outweigh benefits. Staging across separate admissions is often safer.
Q: How long should I wait between surgeries?
A: Typically 3–6 months, depending on recovery, medical optimisation, and patient goals. Some patients may benefit from earlier or later intervals.
Q: What if the patient’s medical conditions worsen between surgeries?
A: Reassess prior to each procedure. You may need to delay, modify the plan, or involve specialist input for optimisation.
Q: Does sequencing affect final outcomes?
A: It can—especially when rehab from one surgery influences recovery from another. Proper sequencing facilitates smoother recovery and better long-term function.
Q: Do insurance and cost impact the sequence?
A: Yes—public vs. private system, waiting lists, and concessional status can shape timing. Discuss pragmatic options with patients up front.